feat: Refactored the sisyhpus agent system to utilize the new skills system to improve performance and reliability

2026-06-02 13:14:25 -06:00
parent b1782b614f
commit c17db05f39
10 changed files with 790 additions and 261 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+description: Evidence requirements before claiming completion — diagnostics, build exit code, tests. No completion without proof. Grants shell access for running build/test commands.
+enabled_tools: execute_command
+---
+You are about to mark work complete. Before claiming "done," produce evidence. "I'm fairly confident it works" is not evidence.
+
+## Hard gates
+
+A task is NOT complete until:
+
+| Change kind | Required evidence |
+|---|---|
+| File edit | Read the file to confirm the change landed; output is clean (or only pre-existing issues, explicitly noted) |
+| Build command exists | `execute_command` the build; exit code 0 |
+| Test command exists | `execute_command` the tests; pass (or explicit note of pre-existing failures unrelated to this change) |
+| Delegation | The delegate's result was received AND verified against your acceptance criteria |
+
+**No evidence = not complete.** Marking a todo done without evidence is dishonest reporting.
+
+## The verification loop
+
+After every meaningful edit:
+
+1. Read the changed file region (confirm the change actually landed where intended).
+2. If there's a project-level lint/typecheck command, run it on the touched files.
+3. Run the project's build/check command if one exists.
+4. Run the project's test command if one exists.
+5. Only then mark the corresponding todo `completed`.
+
+If any step fails: do not mark complete. Fix the issue or surface it explicitly.
+
+## Build/test detection (fallback)
+
+If no build/test command is configured, try standard ones for the project:
+
+- Rust: `cargo check`, `cargo test`
+- Node/TS: `npm run build`, `npm test`, or `pnpm` / `yarn` equivalents
+- Python: `pytest`, `python -m mypy <pkg>`, `ruff check`
+- Go: `go build ./...`, `go test ./...`
+
+Run from the project root. Capture exit codes.
+
+## Distinguishing your failures from pre-existing failures
+
+If build or tests fail, identify the cause:
+
+- Caused by your change? → fix it before reporting complete.
+- Pre-existing (unrelated)? → note it explicitly: "Done. Build passes. Note: 3 lint errors pre-existing in unrelated files, not touched."
+
+Never silently leave broken state behind. Never delete a failing test to make CI green.
+
+## Anti-patterns (BLOCKING)
+
+- "It should work" without running anything
+- Marking a todo complete based on intent, not verified outcome
+- Suppressing errors with `@ts-ignore`, `as any`, `#[allow(...)]` on unfamiliar lints, empty catch blocks
+- Deleting failing tests to "pass"
+- Reporting "all green" when you only ran a subset
+
+## Reporting completion
+
+When the work is verifiably done, report in one sentence:
+
+> "Done. Build passes, 47 tests pass. Modified `auth.rs:42-58` to add JWT validation."
+
+Not a paragraph. Not a victory lap. Specific, terse, evidence-backed.