feat: Refactored the sisyhpus agent system to utilize the new skills system to improve performance and reliability
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Fan-out exploration protocol — fire multiple research agents in parallel, wait for completion notifications, and never duplicate delegated work.
|
||||
---
|
||||
You are entering a research phase. Exploration is parallelizable; serial reads leave throughput on the table.
|
||||
|
||||
## Fan out, don't read serially
|
||||
|
||||
For any non-trivial codebase question, fire 2-5 `explore` agents in parallel, each scoped to a different angle:
|
||||
|
||||
- Auth implementation? → one for routes, one for middleware, one for token handling, one for error response shape.
|
||||
- Bug investigation? → one for the failing path, one for similar working paths, one for recent changes near the area.
|
||||
|
||||
Each agent gets a NARROW slice. Narrow scope = fast, focused result. Broad scope = the agent over-reads and returns a wall of text.
|
||||
|
||||
## The wait protocol
|
||||
|
||||
After spawning background agents:
|
||||
|
||||
1. If you have **non-overlapping** work to do (work that doesn't depend on the delegated research), do it now.
|
||||
2. If you don't, **end your response.** Do not call `agent__collect` immediately — the agent is still running.
|
||||
3. The system notifies you when the agent completes (`pending_escalations` or completion event).
|
||||
4. On notification, call `agent__collect` to retrieve results.
|
||||
|
||||
Polling `agent__collect` on a still-running agent blocks your turn for nothing.
|
||||
|
||||
## Anti-duplication rule (BLOCKING)
|
||||
|
||||
Once you delegate a search to an `explore` agent, **do not perform that same search yourself.**
|
||||
|
||||
Forbidden:
|
||||
- After firing `explore` for "auth middleware", running `fs_grep` for "auth middleware" yourself
|
||||
- "Just quickly checking" the same files the delegate is checking
|
||||
- Re-doing the research while waiting impatiently
|
||||
|
||||
Allowed:
|
||||
- Non-overlapping work in a different module
|
||||
- Preparation work that doesn't depend on the delegated result
|
||||
- Ending your response and waiting
|
||||
|
||||
Duplicate searches waste tokens, may contradict the delegate, and defeat the point of parallelism.
|
||||
|
||||
## Stop conditions
|
||||
|
||||
Stop searching when:
|
||||
|
||||
- The same information appears across multiple sources
|
||||
- Two search iterations yield no new useful data
|
||||
- A direct answer was found
|
||||
- You have enough context to proceed confidently
|
||||
|
||||
Over-exploration is as bad as under-exploration. Time spent searching is time not spent shipping.
|
||||
|
||||
## Parallel + sequential composition
|
||||
|
||||
It is fine to fire `explore` and then `oracle` when oracle needs the explore results — just sequence them:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Fire explore(s) in parallel.
|
||||
2. End response, wait for completion.
|
||||
3. Synthesize findings, fire `oracle` with those findings as CONTEXT.
|
||||
4. End response, wait for oracle.
|
||||
5. Act on oracle's recommendation.
|
||||
|
||||
Don't fire oracle blind to "save a turn" — it will give worse advice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Anti-patterns
|
||||
|
||||
- One huge "explore everything about X" agent → slow, unfocused result
|
||||
- Serial explores ("wait for first, then fire next") → unnecessary latency
|
||||
- Firing 8+ parallel agents → diminishing returns, harder to synthesize
|
||||
- Calling `agent__collect` immediately after spawn → wastes a turn
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user