feat: Deep research upgrade so sisyphus and the architect now have 3 possible research types: librarian standard, librarian deep, and true deep research with reflexion

This commit is contained in:
Dark-Alex-17 committed 2026-09-21 12:29:07 -06:00
1 parent 37ba25adc5
commit a8c0ec64fa
9 files changed
+171 -62

No files matched your search

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Autonomy router for deep-research's approval gate.
Runs after verify_sources. When the `autonomy` variable is
'autonomous' (the run was spawned by another agent — architect or
sisyphus research tiers — with no human at the terminal), the report
skips the human approval node and ends accepted: the reflexion loop
already served as the quality gate, and end_autonomous carries the
source check + pipeline notes with the report so the caller sees them.
Any other value (default 'supervised') proceeds to the human approval
gate unchanged.
Routing (`_next`):
- autonomy == 'autonomous' -> end_autonomous
- anything else -> approve
Fail-safe: a crash here fails FORWARD via the node's `next` to
`approve` — the safe, human-gated direction.
"""
import json
import os
def load_state():
if path := os.environ.get("GRAPH_STATE_FILE"):
with open(path) as f:
return json.load(f)
return json.loads(os.environ.get("GRAPH_STATE", "{}"))
def main():
state = load_state()
autonomy = str(state.get("autonomy") or "supervised").strip().lower()
target = "end_autonomous" if autonomy == "autonomous" else "approve"
print(json.dumps({"_next": target}))
main()
@@ -4,10 +4,11 @@
Reached ONLY via research_one_question's `fallback:` route inside the
`research_each_question` map branch (branch-local — a map branch's fallback
must stay inside the branch subgraph). Grounded in engine behavior: on
llm-node failure the engine writes "LLM node …failed: <chain>" into
`finding` via the node's state_updates BEFORE routing to the fallback (on
success the same key holds the researched findings, which never start with
the "LLM node" prefix). This node normalizes the failure text into a
branch failure the engine writes its failure text into `finding` via the
node's state_updates BEFORE routing to the fallback — "Agent node failed:
<chain>" now that the branch spawns a librarian agent, "LLM node …failed:
<chain>" for an llm branch (on success the same key holds the researched
findings, which never start with either prefix). This node normalizes the failure text into a
PIPELINE-FAULT finding and the chain ends here — the map collects the fault
as the lane's `finding`, so one dead research lane never sinks the whole
map. combine_findings later lifts PIPELINE-FAULT findings into
@@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ def main():
state = load_state()
raw = state.get("finding")
detail = raw.strip().replace("\n", " ") if isinstance(raw, str) else ""
if not detail.startswith("LLM node"):
if not detail.startswith(("LLM node", "Agent node")):
detail = "the research lane died without recording a failure detail"
if len(detail) > MAX_DETAIL_CHARS:
detail = detail[: MAX_DETAIL_CHARS - 1] + "…"
@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
"""Reflexion gate for deep-research.
Runs after `critique` has reviewed the current research findings. If the
critique's verdict is REVISE and the reflexion budget is not spent,
critique's verdict is REVISE and the reflexion budget (the graph's
`reflexion_budget` variable, default 2) is not spent,
loops back to `research` with the critique attached as
`research_feedback`, so the retry is informed rather than a blind
re-run. Otherwise it proceeds to `synthesize`.
@@ -26,9 +27,11 @@ import json
import os
import re
# Automated revision passes allowed. `research` runs at most
# MAX_REFLEXION_REVISIONS + 1 times per user pass. Bump to allow more.
MAX_REFLEXION_REVISIONS = 2
# Default automated revision passes when the `reflexion_budget` variable
# is absent or malformed. `research` runs at most budget + 1 times per
# user pass. Callers raise it via --variables {"reflexion_budget": "6"}
# to let the run churn until the critique passes.
DEFAULT_REFLEXION_REVISIONS = 2
def load_state():
@@ -69,8 +72,9 @@ def main():
critique = state.get("critique") or ""
verdict = parse_verdict(critique)
attempts = as_int(state.get("research_attempts"))
budget = as_int(state.get("reflexion_budget"), DEFAULT_REFLEXION_REVISIONS)
if verdict == "REVISE" and attempts < MAX_REFLEXION_REVISIONS:
if verdict == "REVISE" and attempts < budget:
feedback = (
"A reviewer judged the previous research pass incomplete. "
"Address every point in the critique below:\n\n" + critique