feat: Significant code review suite rewrite with improved graph agent features
This commit is contained in:
41 files changed
+3572
-709
No files matched your search
@@ -81,10 +81,15 @@ Record via the `record-miss` macro (`coyote --macro record-miss "<what escaped>"
|
||||
appends a numbered skeleton entry and prompts for the remaining fields. Or append by hand
|
||||
in the entry format above.
|
||||
|
||||
To BOOTSTRAP a ledger from scratch (new team, new org, new environment), the
|
||||
`mine-review-misses` macro (`coyote --macro mine-review-misses "<org | repo list | .>"`)
|
||||
pulls real PR review history, mines the defect classes human reviewers keep enforcing,
|
||||
and appends the candidates you approve — same entry format, same idempotent numbering.
|
||||
Collection is otherwise AUTOMATIC — no mining pass needed:
|
||||
|
||||
- **whetstone** classifies every externally-raised finding after a run addresses review
|
||||
feedback, and proposes ledger entries (approval-gated) or drops one-offs into the
|
||||
candidates inbox (`<config>/share/review-miss-candidates.jsonl`) as recurrence evidence.
|
||||
- **PR-review reconciliation** (where a re-review compares what humans said against what
|
||||
the panel found) records each human-caught, panel-missed defect into the same candidates
|
||||
inbox. The inbox is raw material, never authority: nothing enters the LEDGER without
|
||||
your approval — that curation is the noise firewall that keeps the ledger trustworthy.
|
||||
|
||||
Rules for good entries:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user