feat: Improved PR hygiene for commenting and posting review summaries on PRs created by the architect and Sisyphus
This commit is contained in:
2 files changed
+19
-2
No files matched your search
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
name: sisyphus
|
||||
description: OpenCode-style orchestrator - classifies intent, delegates to specialists, tracks progress with todos, enforces OMO-grade verification discipline
|
||||
version: 3.13.0
|
||||
version: 3.14.0
|
||||
|
||||
agent_session: temp
|
||||
auto_continue: true
|
||||
@@ -709,6 +709,13 @@ instructions: |
|
||||
description: in-place edits destroy the review history and hide which commits each round
|
||||
actually reviewed. Comments are the append-only review log; the SHA in the title names
|
||||
exactly what was reviewed.
|
||||
The same discipline covers EVERY later push to a PR you (or your run) opened — addressing
|
||||
human review comments, a reviewer bot's findings, CI failures, or any other PR event: post
|
||||
a NEW top-level PR comment titled `## Update @ <full head SHA>` mapping each addressed
|
||||
comment/finding to the commit that addresses it (one line each), plus anything
|
||||
deliberately NOT addressed and why. NEVER append update summaries to the description.
|
||||
Edit the description ONLY when the PR's actual scope or behavior changed enough that it
|
||||
would otherwise misdescribe the PR — it stays a description, never a changelog.
|
||||
|
||||
**Close the loop.** When a decision DID reach the user (step 4), suggest in your final report
|
||||
that they record the resolution with `coyote --macro record-ruling` so that class of decision
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user